SUBJECT:
|
Antonio Sanches’z new album "New Life"
Back to Subjects
|
carlosportocarrero
Feb 15 2013 at 3:56 PM
|
I just found out Antonio’s new album
called "New Life" will be released on
February 26th. I found this on youtube.
Sounds great! I can’t wait to get the
album!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=sbD6ryBkcCE |
Login to Post |
From: |
Message: |
aloc
Mar 20 2013 at 2:58 AM
|
Thana Alexa has a nice voice indeed. From what I’ve understood, she’s been collecting money thru donations to produce her debut, which would feature Antonio aswell. As to the whole Unity thing: well, there are other great "new" singers whom, in addition of possessing a great voice, also play a vast arsenal of instruments...
|
akakak
Mar 19 2013 at 8:28 PM
|
What a wonderful singer on Antonio’s new album. Than Alexa - Amazing vocals on new life. I was thinking, how amazing it could be if she was added to the unity band!
|
bluepno
Mar 19 2013 at 5:25 PM
|
I am impressed...full circle and
no one invoked Godwin’s
Law...although 68 posts is
reaching the limit...now back to
Antonio’s album...
|
djbinder
Mar 19 2013 at 2:42 PM
|
See there, jnyutah? On that we
absolutely agree! :)
|
jnyutah
Mar 19 2013 at 1:04 PM
|
i would say uprising and evolutions is an
homage to coltrane and his message
moving it forward to now listen to day
trip where on some tunes antonio is
channeling some serious elvin jones
|
METHenyaddicted
Mar 19 2013 at 12:00 PM
|
David Binney is so awesomely cute - if I knew that I would have listened to ’Graylen’ sooner. Oh yeah, the new cd. I ordered based on the comments but it’s taking a long while to get here. Meanwhile here is a track I found from the cd - I think it’s no. 3 on the playlist performed at a jazz club. Excellent. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUC98v_r-yc&list=UUyKaaVFqQEqdEu0OheOUwJA.
|
harn
Mar 19 2013 at 8:22 AM
|
Just to go off at a tangent here;
Antonio Sanchez has a new album
out, any thoughts?......
|
Tom Rudd
Mar 19 2013 at 7:35 AM
|
jnyutah, implying that dj or anyone else here in the Garage is "very dense or dumb", is a personal attack. It may be your opinion, if so keep it to yourself. There is a reason why you have gotten very few posts on your ZTFS thread, No one here want to have a dialogue with you. Until you develop some sort of internet social skills, take it somewhere else.
|
djbinder
Mar 19 2013 at 7:05 AM
|
OK, back to the music - folks who
posted that are absolutely correct
(though I appreciate the ongoing
support, folks, truly).
Dave Binney tells me they’ve been
touring South America and it’s been
going absolutely fabulously.
So let’s start with a question, for
those who’ve heard this record and
Antonio’s previous two: do you also
feel that he’s made a serious leap
forward as a writer? Acknowledging
he’s always had great groups on his
records, it just seems to me that this
is quite a step forward in his writiing )
(something Metheny also
acknowledges in his liners, so
JNYUTAH, if you disagree with me,
perhaps you’ll agree with Pat?).
So, folks. How do you feel about the
writing? Someone posted, way back,
that the first track, being very Post-
Coltrane, put them off at first. FVor
me, quite the opposite , as it simply
presented a different side to
Antonio....something that continues
throughout the record, as I think the
writing here is also more eclectic and
diverse than anything that’s come
before.
Thoughts?
|
carlosportocarrero
Mar 19 2013 at 5:45 AM
|
Depressing...
|
Antoñete
Mar 19 2013 at 4:49 AM
|
jnyutah, for what I’ve read, I think that you are un poco gilipollas, bastante tontoloscojones y te veo cierto retraso mental y una considerable dificultad de comprensión, but that’s not being unkind, it’s just an opinion.
|
blisterfree
Mar 19 2013 at 2:43 AM
|
An unwitting troll, or one in self-denial, or one who plays bait and switch, is still a troll. The only solution is to stop feeding him. Otherwise the troll wins and everyone else loses. After 57 replies, it’s time to cut our losses, eh?
|
fredsimon
Mar 19 2013 at 12:51 AM
|
When you call someone "dumb" "dense" or "stupid" you are being unkind. And this childish stonewalling isn’t fooling anyone here, except perhaps yourself.
|
jnyutah
Mar 18 2013 at 8:18 PM
|
its not unkind behavior, how can giving
my opinion be unkind? you must be
delusional, by all means cross the street,
|
fredsimon
Mar 18 2013 at 5:19 PM
|
jynutah, I’m gonna try again to help you understand what the problem is here ... of course you’re entitled to your opinions about musical issues -- everyone here has repeatedly said that -- but you’re not entitled to rewrite reality. When you try to do so by saying "they ostracize those who don’t agree with their opinions" you are just plain incorrect ... no one here is ostracizing you for your musical opinions, it’s for your aggressively unkind behavior. And when called out on it, blustering and stonewalling does not help. Take your own advice: you seriously need to take a look at yourself. Frankly, I’m usually more than happy to discuss esoteric musical issues; it’s part of what I do as a teacher. But your behavior is so off-putting it makes me want to cross to the other side of the street instead.
|
thehague
Mar 18 2013 at 5:05 PM
|
C’mon guys, it’s been enough. Let the
music speak. That’s always the truth.
|
Antoñete
Mar 18 2013 at 5:02 PM
|
You guy seriously need to take a look at yourself
|
carlosportocarrero
Mar 18 2013 at 4:53 PM
|
It’s a shame that what started as a
constructive post about Antonio’s great
album turned out this way. The actual
posts about the album and the music
were very few compared to all the
bickering.
Talks volumes about human nature...
|
jnyutah
Mar 18 2013 at 3:53 PM
|
and i’ll quote bob dylan from all along
the watch tower
"so let us not talk falsely now the hour is
getting late"
|
jnyutah
Mar 18 2013 at 8:54 AM
|
theres nothing to apologize for, you
guys seriously need to take a look at
yourselves
|
harn
Mar 18 2013 at 8:24 AM
|
Just skimmed through all these
posts, it’s given me a really good
laugh during my lunch break! I have
yet to find out anything about the
album in question though so I’ll be
checking out djbinder’s review later
on as they are always incisive,
informative and well written. The
whole thing has reminded me of a
saying that a friend of mine used to
use regularly; never argue with an
idiot as they will only drag you down
to their level and then beat you on
experience!
|
djbinder
Mar 18 2013 at 5:06 AM
|
I’ve no issue with you taking issue,
jnyutah, it’s HOW you do it, as Fred
says, I’ve not called you dumb, idiot
or any of the other things you’ve
called me. As for moment by moment
analysis of TWU and Elling, it’s pretty
hard for me to do from an airport
lounge. But again, most music fans
don’t want that kind of
analysis....perhaps if I wrote for guitar
player, say; but at All About Jazz,
most readers are not musicians so
are looking for explanations of the
music in terms they can understand,
you don’t like it, or you don’t agree,
no problem. But treat me with some
respect, respect that most people
deserve, and apologize for not
disagreeing with me, but doing so in
a rude and offensive fashion, and I
suspect you and I may have lots to
talk about...even if we disagree. That
is not the issue; treating people with
respect is. I am sorry you are
schizophrenic, but perhaps you
should not post when go you are
either off your meds or not feeling
well. That does not give you carte
Blanche to treat people badly. Sorry,
but I have a family member who is
seriously bipolar, and they would
never hide behind their illness when it
comes to bad behavior...they would
apologize for it. Because I do have
someone in the family with a mood
affective disorder, you do have my
sympathies, but bad behavior simply
is bad behavior and if you go off the
rails, then at least an apology for that
would, as Fred says, go a long way.
But i do feel for ya, it’s a tough, tough
illness and the treatment is
sometimes worse than the illness.
|
jnyutah
Mar 17 2013 at 9:08 PM
|
plus if you post your reviews and plug
them, i have every right to call it as i
interpret it, so much for all inclusiveness
you can disregard me all you want it
does not matter remember there was a
time when everyone thought the world
was flat go ahead and berate me for
speaking freely so much for jazz
|
jnyutah
Mar 17 2013 at 8:59 PM
|
with all due respect mr simon, i can use
those words if you don’t agree then go
ahead and jump on the bandwagon, I’ve
posted as i said before actual fax based
things in regards to mr binder and all to
no avail, let me see adults start wars,
they fleece the poor, they kick a man
when hes down, the ostracize those who
don’t agree with their opinions, it
doesn’t matter if I’m taken seriously
because i know where I’m coming from
and believe me I’ve posted some stuff
after careful listening and not taken
seriously,
plus i am a diagnosed schizophrenic
i filter things differently please stop
trying to evade the truth.
|
fredsimon
Mar 17 2013 at 8:04 PM
|
jnyutah wrote: "[djbinder has] less tact than me" ----- Really?! When did he ever call you "dumb" "dense" or "stupid," as you have called him? You behaved poorly, and then when people call you on the behavior you don’t even own up to it, much less apologize. C’mon, be a mensch and do the right thing, especially if you want your musical opinions taken seriously.
|
hman01
Mar 17 2013 at 1:11 PM
|
Ask James Bond how he liked his
"martini".
|
jnyutah
Mar 17 2013 at 11:42 AM
|
and for the harmonic similarities its
somewhere in the way up not at the
tempo changes i was talking about
|
jnyutah
Mar 17 2013 at 11:33 AM
|
they used his voice leading books as a
reference when they were writing the
way up, what do you think about the
tempo change in the way up from the
start bar 1 quarter note 162 bpm to 122
bar 177? check out the tune timeline and
kurt ellings the beauty of all things,
hear any harmonic similarities? and
what do you think of section K1 bar 406
to 425 where its rubato? tell me whats
your take on part two at wich is at 141
bpm from a previous 172 bpm
preceding that , then listen to part 3 at
around 12 minutes in listen for maybe
30 seconds tell whats happening there
please, its pretty real not an adjective,
and you have less tact than me, im
happy that you have a public outlet aaj
to write what you think about music
and also a forum where what u promote
is untouchable thats great, i don’t have
that I’m not asking for that, maybe if you
really look at how your reacting. I’m
pretty sure it was you about martini
cause they got real defensive like you
did, any way keep on writing and check
out that stuff i will surely check out
newlife and give you a scathing review
cheers
|
djbinder
Mar 17 2013 at 7:43 AM
|
And I assure you it was not me re:
Martino (not Martini!). I love him to
death, and was thrilled with the
Joyous Lake reunion. Not sure what
your bug is on that front, but you are
simply incorrect, as I was not writing
about jazz at the time of that release.
I only began writing and getting
published in 2003, started at All
About Jazz in 2004. So you are
ascribing things to me that are simply
not mine. What do you want to talk
about? That Mick Goodrick’s
approach was hugely influential on
Pat’s early days and so, while his
own voice clearly emerged, it’s still
part of his DNA? What do you want
to discuss about metric and tempo
shifts in TWU? What specifically?
Why? That’s an unusual question,
but such things are usually done for
reasons that have to do with
compositional development
(especially in longform pieces),
harmonic tension and release (a big
part of TWU’s overall MO I
think)...what exactly is the question
beyond why? What are your
thoughts. Let’s start there.
|
djbinder
Mar 17 2013 at 7:38 AM
|
Never said you were dumb. But if
you’ve yet to actually discuss MY
review with any intelligence...largely
because you cannot if you’ve not
heard it? How can you argue my
assessments if you’ve not heard the
musci which is being assessed? I
make no complaints against
Antonio’s early recordings (I say
they’re good records), but that he’s
grown on this one. If my explanations
(not defensive, but trying to address
your attacks with reasoned
arguments) don’t make sense, then
discuss them. And yes, I’’m quite
familiar with the music you mention,
but again, in a generalist jazz site like
All About Jazz you tend to avoid
getting into technical matters too
much, as the purpose is the expose
the music to a broader audience, not
just musicians. If none of this makes
sense, and if you still just hate critics
on a knee jerk - if you don’t feel the
need to read us, then fine, i’ve no
issue. I also have no issue discussing
things like adults. What I’ve no time
for is blanket generalizations and
personal attacks that, in at least one
case (Martino) are absolutely untrue.
Get your facts straight, discuss and
disagree with respect and like an
adult, and we can have plenty to talk
about but your offensive "do you
know this? Do you know thast"
approach is not conducive to real
discussion and debate. I could do the
same to you, but where would we
be? I agree with you 100percent that if we
all loved the same thing and didn;t
disagree, music wouldn’t be what it
is. But that doesn’t mean that being
disrespectful and aggressive is
proper. You can debate - even
heatedly - without making it personal,
as you did from your very first post. If
you’d be prepared to back off from
that stance and just **discuss** the
music, I’d be all ears...and would
have no problem with you
disagreeing with my assessments.
That’s never an issue; it’s all about
approach. Didn;t your mother tell you
"you catch more flies with honey"?
|
mountain
Mar 17 2013 at 7:34 AM
|
The upside on the troll posts is that it
has engaged some folks to provide
some interesting insights to how thy
evaluate music and has created
some passionate postings to the AG
that has been somewhat flat of
recent. Looking at the glass half full
of course.
|
thehague
Mar 17 2013 at 3:14 AM
|
Aha, now it’s clear: mr jezusnyutah wants to be a critic himself, but isn’t doing quite as good as real critics.
|
jnyutah
Mar 16 2013 at 9:28 PM
|
ok for example lets talk about the way
up why do the have metric modulations
in different sections and why did they
choose those different tempos? why did
they use mick good ricks voice leading
books as a reference? have you listened
to kurt ellingtons the beauty of all things
and then listened to the way up? have
you heard whats going on in the end
segment? tell me I’m dumb and a troll
|
jnyutah
Mar 16 2013 at 9:13 PM
|
I’ve discussed previous critiques before
on a factual basis and an understanding
of the music presented, all to no avail,
im pretty sure it was djbinder about
martini i remember that disticinctly
because i studied the music.
|
djbinder
Mar 16 2013 at 7:00 PM
|
Jnyutah, I’d be happy to engage with
you on points. Point one, I wasn’t the
critic about Martino because I wasn’t
a critic at that time. Second, you can
say what you will but it has to be
actual arguable points not ’I don’t
agree with you, even though I’ve not
heard the album because I hate
critics.’ Listen to the record, then read
what I’ve said, you disagree? I’ll be
happy to. Ave an adult, civil
discussion with you. Problem is, it
doesn’t appear that you are any more
capable of that than you are getting
names spelled correctly, I’m done
with you, unless you want to really
discuss and not just come out with an
attack that’s based on no facts, no
reality, just your supposition.
|
fredsimon
Mar 16 2013 at 6:14 PM
|
jnyutah, no one has a problem with your differing opinions on the relative merits of the music. As I first wrote, I do have a problem with you calling someone "stupid" "dense" and "dumb" just because you don’t agree with them. Hopefully you can discern the distiction.
|
blisterfree
Mar 16 2013 at 2:39 PM
|
The Kenny G of forum trolls roams
among us. All blowhard, no ideas.
Look at me.
|
jnyutah
Mar 16 2013 at 10:41 AM
|
im pretty sure it was you, anyway
i don’t need someone to convince me
one way or another about an albums
merits or not, if your a critic in a public
forum then expect to be criticized about
your critiques youve been way to
defensive about what u have written and
it has nothing to do with the music
because it would still be there, and im
not a troll just because i don’t say what
you would prefer or agree with your
critique its crazy how u automatically go
haywire if someone doesn’t like what
you wrote, good music wouldn’t be
around if we were all pleasant to each
other.
|
Chris Digger
Mar 16 2013 at 7:07 AM
|
To yossarian: maybe Vinnie Colaiuta could drum the PMG-style.
|
djbinder
Mar 15 2013 at 8:03 PM
|
On more thing: yes, you’ve the right
to say anything you damn well
please, but if you talk trash, you can
also be sure that others have the
right to call you out on it..and ask you
to support your arguments, not just
make blanket generalizations
because some critic dissed a record
you liked 15 years ago.
|
djbinder
Mar 15 2013 at 8:00 PM
|
Wow, jnyutah. First, I don’t know
what critic you’re talking about re Pat
Martino (not Martini, just btw), but it
sure wasn’t me - I happn to be a
huge fan of Joyous Lake as well as
Stone Blue, where he reunited most
of the original group and delivered a
kick-ass set. More to the point, I am
absolutely gobsmacked to learn that
you’ve come railing out against critics
in general and me in particular when
you’ve not even heard the album!
Maybe if you did, you might actually
agree with me, but either way, you’d
at least have some ammunition for a
debate. You question my
assessments without hearing the
album to know if they make sense or
not? Sounds to me like whoever said
you were a troll is spot on. I did not
belittle Miguel Zenón (not Xenon,
which is a gas; if you’re going to get
so outraged you’d think you could at
least spell the artists’ nammes
correctly); I was very clear that
Antonio’s first two records were very
good records. But they did not
represent his compositions skills the
way this new one does. They were
more blowing albums, and not just in
my assessment, but in his as well. he
was honing his compositional chops,
to be sure (which i say); here, in my
opinion, he’s really arrived as a
writer. While nothing like PMG,
Antonio’s new record is closer
aesthetically in that there is some
very deep writing here as well as
some serious playing from everyone
involved - like PMG, some very
accessible sounding music that’s a lot
deeper and more complex under the
hood. I happen to love Dave Binney’s
playing on this album, but in no way
does that belittle Miguel (whose
music I happen to love). So, perhaps
you should get your shit together
before you come out with both guns
blazing. At the very least, check out
the record...and, oh yeah, spell the
artist names correctly, since you’re so
annoyed at critics disrespecting
them. At least we know how to spell
their names, which is also a pretty
significant sign of respect. And as for
Antonio bringing something different
and raising the game with PMG? I
think he’s certainly afforded Metheny
some freedom that he didn’t have
before, and that’s no disrespect to
Paul...if you look at each of the three
PMG drummers, they’ve been very
different and suited the music of the
time...though, truthfully, Paul never
really got the chance to show his full
breadth with PMG; for that, you need
to check out some of his own post-
PMG records. Anyway, I think I’m
done trying to talk reasonably with
you. You’ve decided all critics are
shite, when, based on what you’ve
written, you’ve trouble stringing words
together in a meaningful fashion. So
before you start making
generalizations about any group of
people, maybe you should learn how
to spell the names of the musicians
you cite, and put forward your
arguments in clear, meaningful ways.
Oh yeah, and actually hear the music
before you disagree with the writer’s
assessment. Sheesh.....
|
yossarian
Mar 15 2013 at 7:20 PM
|
I haven’t heard any of Antonio’s stuff - will do so now, thanks for the youtube clip. The drum chair in PMG is a hard one to fill - you got to have great power and rock out at times but play with superhuman subtlety and cymbal fluidity the rest of the time. Wertico and Sanchez are both amazing to achive that. I doubt there are that many who could do it. I often wonder with Antonio, who is truly one of the greats, how much he had to add to his ’thing’ back in 2002 when he joined PMG. Think he was playing in Avishai Cohen’s band back then - a great band but still a huge leap to PMG.
|
Chris Digger
Mar 15 2013 at 6:56 PM
|
The Jazz Police is always and everywhere - so do not cross police line ;-)
|
thehague
Mar 15 2013 at 5:39 PM
|
It takes all kinds here these days,
doesn’t it?
|
jnyutah
Mar 14 2013 at 6:55 PM
|
to fred simon creativity was identifiable
through its immunity to idomatic
definitions today is the imaginary day
|
jnyutah
Mar 14 2013 at 6:54 PM
|
i remember years ago some critic on this
site was talking about pat martini, and
some offhanded comments about his
playing
and i used to listen to this album joyous
lake in fact this tune, and he redid it on
a new album and i couldn’t believe what
i read because basically the guy was full
of shit literally, and as far as the new
album from mr sanchez i haven’t heard
it but no one ever talks about how
literally everything changed when pat
brought him in to the pmg now compare
him to paul wertico antonio is a new
voice and a very contemporary one, and
i don’t like critcs who can’t see the deep
level david sanchez and the other sara
phone i think it was miguel xenon on
that live at jazz standard that belittles
them i don’t have a beef with anyone i
have the right to say what i think just as
the krickets do.
|
hman01
Mar 14 2013 at 6:45 PM
|
jnyutah-you need to get a new life
|
franksexton
Mar 14 2013 at 6:25 PM
|
jnyutah, you are a troll "and that’s all I’m going to say about that", done.
|
fredsimon
Mar 14 2013 at 5:23 PM
|
jnyutah wrote: "no one commented on the quote from pat about zero tolerance for silence? now did they?" ----- What quote? Where is it? Not in this thread. Instead of raising a red herring, why not actually respond to some of the issues addressed to you here? Again, I’d really like to know: in coherent, specific terms, what exactly is your complaint with Kelman’s review of Antonio’s new album?
|
jnyutah
Mar 14 2013 at 12:37 PM
|
no one commented on the quote from
pat about zero tolerance for silence?
now did they?
|
franksexton
Mar 14 2013 at 8:33 AM
|
jnyutah, I might add that Fred Simon is a musician also and a very good one who has played with Steve Rodby (Pat’s long time bass play in the PMG). I am not a musician myself but I agrre with what Fred is saying. I find that John’s reviews help me to better undestand and enjoy the music I listen to.
|
djbinder
Mar 14 2013 at 7:34 AM
|
Thanks Fred. One last comment to
jnyutah: critics need not be
musicians, but it just so happens I
AM one, have spent years playing
gigs at home and on the road, and
spent ten years (back when this
actually happened) as the house
guitarist for a local studio. Not that I
would ever place myself at the level
of folks I write about (and that
includfes Fred), but I do have more
than a passing acquaintance with
theory, with being in a studio, with
working with good (and bad)
producers) and how to assess
music, at least to a certain degree.
But that really is neither here nor
there. I’d ask you this (since both
Metheny, in his writing adn Antonio,
in email to me, both seem to agree
that he’s taken a big leap forward
compositionally. So if you don’t hear
it, my friend, I’d toss the question
back at you: if you’ve heard this
record and don’t think it represents a
major step forward for Antonio, then
perhaps you need to listen to it again.
I was very clear about liking his first
two records, but if an artist cannot, on
occasion, demonstrate significant
steps forward in his/her music, then
I’m not exactly sure what planet
you’re on. Most arists aspire to
personal growth as musicians, and
sometimes as bandleadrs and
writers, and if a critic (I actualy hate
that term, to be honest) can’t reflect
that in a review, well then, what
exactly should he reflect? You don’t
go into deep technical detail if you
are writing for a generalist site like All
About Jazz, but the truth is, I don’t
have to explain myself to you. It was
a glowing review that recognized the
value of his past records but
indicated there’s some serious
forward motion here. Not sure how,
unless you dislike the record and
therefore disagree with that
assessment, why you’d have any
problem with such a review. Neither
Antonio nor any of the other band
members I’ve heard from seem to
disagree,.....
|
Chris Digger
Mar 14 2013 at 6:51 AM
|
MAKE PEACE!!!
|
fredsimon
Mar 13 2013 at 11:30 PM
|
jnyutah, again, I’m flummoxed as to just exactly what your beef with John Kelman is? Your generic dismissal of critics is misplaced when it comes to Kelman, who is one of the most astute, musically knowledgeable, and fair-minded writers working today. Are there critics out there who have no idea what the hell they’re talking about? Sure, but Kelman is absolutely not one of them ... if you think he is, then you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about. And what does his having written (or not written) musical compositions got to do with it? Where are your compositions? Were they treated unkindly by some critic, and therefore all critics suck? What exactly is your message?
|
jnyutah
Mar 13 2013 at 2:06 PM
|
so how many compositions have you
wrote except for a critique? so now we
have a new revelation you know how one
takes a quantum leap musically? where
are they playing next? the restaurant at
the end of the universe?
|
djbinder
Mar 13 2013 at 6:16 AM
|
One more comment: of course any
recording is a document of where the
artist is at that particular time. But
where Sanchez was, at the time of
Jazz Standard, was a playing
bandleader still honing his
compositional chops. If you can’t
hear the leap forward in his writing
this time around - deeper, more
layered writing that sounds easy on
the surface but is far from so under
the covers - well, I’m not sure what
else to say. Also, the review doesn’t
dis either record, but it simply says
that the compositional strength of
New Life is something for which
neither of Sanchez’s previous records
would prepare, and I stick by that. If
a review cannot articulate how an
artist has changed - and, in some
cases, grown - then Im not sure what
you think it should be for. But, again,
some concrete examples rather than
generalities would be nice.
|
djbinder
Mar 13 2013 at 6:12 AM
|
jnyutah, to say that i’s not about the
music for critics is unfairly (and
unjustifiably) generalist. Speaking for
myself, it’s all about the music. You
may not agree with my assessment,
and that’s fine - that;’s why we have
these boards - butif yo’re so
concerned with talking about the
music, then why not do just that. My
review of New Life does, in fact, not
only contextualize it with Sanchez’s
previous two recordings, it also
includes hotlinks to those reviews
(but if you didn’t see them, here’s the
review of Migration:
http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/artic
le.php?id=26717 and Live at Jazz
Standard:
http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/artic
le.php?id=37288). The point being,
and frankly this is something that
both Metheny and Sanchez feel, is
that as fine as those two recordings
were, with New Life Sanchez has
made a huge leap forward
compositionally, so not exactly sure
what your beef is. I am not sure how
much clearer a sentence like this
could be: "Neither of those recordings
—good as they are—are suitable
preparation for New Life, where
Sanchez takes a quantum leap
forward as his compositional,
conceptual and bandleading skills
catch up with his playing. " If you
disagree, how about some concrete
comments rather than some
whitewashing hatred of critics? Also,
as a writer you need to balance a
line: reviews are not just meant for
musicians, they’re meant for
listeners, not all of whom have a
musical background, so the objective
is to contextualize the music in terms
to which anyone (or, at least, most
anyone) can relate. Cheers! DJ
|
blisterfree
Mar 11 2013 at 10:32 PM
|
A good critic interprets the music in relative terms and, yes, passes a value judgment on it. As DJ has done. Not because we necessarily need that, but because some of us may want it. We may or may not agree with the interpretation or the value judgment, of course, and therein lies the push-pull of the human urge to critique. Because no critique would incite any emotion in us unless we, ourselves, hadn’t the need to do the exact same thing.
|
jnyutah
Mar 11 2013 at 4:14 PM
|
my beef with critics is that it has nothing
to do with the music! if he can give me
musical examples of say the live 2cd set
and compare it to the new cd or the first
one tell me explicitly whats going on in
the music in realtime I’m sure u haven’t
really heard the live on at jazz standard
to appreciate it, one is not better or
worse, it is a document of what they were
doing at that time, not what you prefer.
|
djbinder
Mar 11 2013 at 8:22 AM
|
akakak: John Escreet is originally from the UK but has been living in the US for the past several years; he has four albums of his own as a leader (two on Binney’s Mythology label) and are also highly recommended. Cheers! Dave
|
djbinder
Mar 11 2013 at 7:08 AM
|
My review of drummer Antonio Sanchez’s New Life, today at All About Jazz.
Some people come out of the gate charging; others take a little time to make that record, the one where everything aligns to assert them as not just great players, but great writers and bandleaders as well. After two fine albums for Cam Jazz, Sanchez’s New Life is that album. With an incendiary group - Dave Binney: alto saxophone; Donny McCaslin: tenor saxophone; John Escreet: piano, Fender Rhodes; Matt Brewer: acoustic and electric bass; Thana Alexa: voice - he’s got a group ready for anything, and across his eight originals, that’s exactly what he gets.
Sanchez’s skill as a drummer has been clear since he first emerged with Pat Metheny Group in 2002 with Speaking of Now; but with New Life his compositional skill has take a major step forward, both in reach and multilayered depth. One of the year’s best, despite it only being March.
Review here: http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=44081
|
naut
Mar 08 2013 at 6:02 PM
|
Terrific album, in all ways. The title track is really something. I’ve only heard it a few times, and it gets better each listen. I’m sort of typeless; I can’t praise this record enough. Love it.
|
Tom Rudd
Feb 25 2013 at 5:44 AM
|
My mistake s’ for some reason i thought Chris was the only sax player on that Cd.
|
akakak
Feb 23 2013 at 7:34 AM
|
Just saw Antonio last night at Scullers Jazz Club in Boston. Amazing show with David Binney on Sax and a great piano player from England. Antonio’s drumming was off the charts great. I was about 6 feet from is left side slightly toward the rear and had an excellent view of him on the drums. I got the new CD from him last night and will listen today!
|
s in Boston
Feb 22 2013 at 11:32 AM
|
Tom, what makes you say Potter was overdubbed? There were two tenor players on the date, David Sanchez being the other one.
|
Tom Rudd
Feb 21 2013 at 12:10 PM
|
Nod and a wink Fred.
|
Tom Rudd
Feb 21 2013 at 5:40 AM
|
Can’t wait to hear this new release by Antonio. The only thing I did not like about "Migration" was Chris Potters over dubed Saxophone. Not to take away from Chris’s brilliance,that just seemed out of place to me.
|
fredsimon
Feb 21 2013 at 1:29 AM
|
Whoa there, jnyutah, djbinder is neither "dense" nor "dumb" ... why the personal invective? He didn’t say the earlier albums were "just" blowing sessions, he said that they were "more" blowing sessions ... big difference: the former is dismissive, the latter descriptive. And he said that he has no problem with chordless ensembles in general but that the addition of chording instruments in an expanded ensemble gives the new album more compositional depth and he prefers that. What’s the problem?
|
jnyutah
Feb 20 2013 at 5:52 PM
|
i dont agree that those earlier works
were just blowing sessions, if his latest
work was without chordal instrument,
which is really stupid on your part
because if thats a criteria on how you
judge someones music you are very
dense or dumb in my opinion
|
djbinder
Feb 16 2013 at 10:49 PM
|
It’s a landmark for ANtonio. Certainly the best of his three releases as a leader by a longshot, because it’s a stronger indication of his compositional skills, whereas the first two were more blowing sessions. I also like the fact that there’s a larger ensemble with a chordal instrument. Barring the guest spots by Corea and Metheny on his first, the other two are largely chordless, and for some reason (as I’ve normally no problem with that) i kinda always hoped to hear Antonio’s writing in the context of a band with one or more chordal instruments. Now I’ve got it and man, am I happy about it!
|
Login to Post |