SUBJECT:
|
ZTFS - TSOTF
Back to Subjects
|
eric
Nov 20 2012 at 7:15 AM
|
Music is not a mere product - commodity to be consumed
like fast food, easy and disposable. Music requires attention,
heart, effort and rewards us with deep revelations, maybe
occasional profound experiences if we are lucky. But not
without effort. And like food, of which music is a type, not
everything tastes great to everyone. And tastes change as we
grow and learn. PS - These records MUST be played LOUD. |
Login to Post |
From: |
Message: |
MilesMethenyfan44
Nov 29 2012 at 8:30 PM
|
Honestly though when I’m listening to Avant Garde styles of jazz what I’m really lisenting for is how invested in the performance are the players. For example Coltrane always puts 100percent of his soul into every solo he does, as does Cecil and Ornette. It might sound chaotic but if you listen it really sounds like the people playing it are giving every ounce of what they have for the performance. Obviously it also has to do with the creativity of the ideas and the interaction but first I look for the emotion and TSOF and ZTFS actually have alot of all these elements. I could completely understand why someone might not like it however.
|
MilesMethenyfan44
Nov 29 2012 at 8:20 PM
|
I always liked The Sign of Four alot more than ZTFS. I felt like there was a little more going on in that one.I think Pat should do a duo album with either Han bennink or Cecil Taylor in this vein that would be cool!
|
bluepno
Nov 27 2012 at 9:22 AM
|
Maybe a clue...The title to
one tale of the great Sherlock
Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan
Doyle...The Sign of
Four...coincidence? Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle described how he
was commissioned to write the
story over a dinner with
Joseph M. Stoddart, managing
editor of Lippincott’s Monthly
Magazine, at the Langham Hotel
in London on 30 August 1889.
Stoddart wanted to produce an
English version of
Lippincott’s with a British
editor and British
contributors. The dinner was
also attended by Oscar Wilde,
who eventually contributed The
Picture of Dorian Gray to the
July 1890 issue. Doyle
discussed what he called this
"golden evening" in his 1924
autobiography Memories and
Adventures.(wikipedia)
|
franksexton
Nov 26 2012 at 12:19 PM
|
akakak, I listen to those in the same way. Great minds think alike.
|
rbslscpa
Nov 26 2012 at 2:16 AM
|
To each his own. For me it is kind of like the emperor has no clothes, but maybe i just don’t get it. I have been a fan of Pat since 1979 and I own EVERY cd. Even ZTFS and TSOF.
Cheers
|
bluepno
Nov 25 2012 at 5:33 PM
|
Sign of Four....3 live
discs...quite an
experiment...great
companions...many have argued
that it is not real so I have
them wait for the live
applause.A beautiful mess...
|
eric
Nov 25 2012 at 4:11 PM
|
TSOTF = The Sign of the Four, a recording of improvisational music Pat made with Paul Wertico & Greg Bendian on
drums and Derek Bailey on guitar. Some like to think of this as a continuation of musical adventures that you can
trace from Song X with Ornette Coleman (a hero of music) and ZTFS. I might agree for the sake of a starting point of
discussion since all three of these records require openness and desire to stretch your ears in a different way than
some of Pat’s other recordings might. But the idea that listening is active and involves a joyful effort is a great secret
that musicians know and listeners can acquire. I half joke about the great secret but it does seem hidden in plain view
at times. TSOTF could be played while you are involved in other activity. I used to make art listening to Song X and
ZTFS. But repeated close listens and learning about the artists and the genre of improvisational music will deepen
your experience. In the end you may or may not be drawn to these kinds of musics, but after listening to them you
will know more about Pat’s explorations and you may even start to hear tiny sparks of these flavors in lots of his other
records. All his records are - as he has alluded to - all like one big piece of music.
|
akakak
Nov 23 2012 at 10:26 AM
|
Hi Franksexton - Yes I have listened to this. Its really great. I set up a playlist on my IPOD that has the coltrane version followed by the Nels Cline/Gregg Bendian version of each piece. I find the two versions compliment each other as each are different but capture the same feeling and spirit. Put together, the two versions contain about 2 hours of music. I think this works because the use of guitar on one version versus tenor sax provides a different sonic landscape, but also compliments of the sax. The intensity is there throughout.
|
mightymouse
Nov 21 2012 at 3:32 PM
|
i remember the first time i heard the
album rejoicing in high school and i
thought they were speaking in tongues
beautiful music
|
franksexton
Nov 21 2012 at 8:48 AM
|
Hi akakak, Have you listened to Interstellar Space Revisited ?
|
franksexton
Nov 21 2012 at 8:09 AM
|
eric, TSOTF is that "The Sign of Four" ?
|
akakak
Nov 21 2012 at 7:42 AM
|
Eric - this is a good post. I have been a serious listener of music my entire life. I had a similar experience with a Coltrane record I bought back in the 70’s. At that time (I may have been 16 or 17)I was really getting into the art rock stuff and the jazz rock thing that was booming at that time and found I was moving towards jazz quickly. I found a record (Coltrane’s Interstellar space) and bought it. I played it and immediately didn’t like it. I actually never played it again for a while. Then heard some other Coltrane music and liked that. After continuing exploring many different things for a while, I later went back to Interstellar Space and it clicked immediately. Something was different in the way I heard this music. This always lead me to the feeling that listening itself is a skill and art. Also, I think when one hears specific song forms or sounds over long periods (for example listening to pop music on top 40 radio), your brain to a point can become conditioned to this. So when exposed to something that is sharply different in terms of sound and form, the reaction may be a negative one. I could be wrong about this, but this idea is what I have sensed from my own listening experiences over the years.
A great example happened a long time ago when Stravinski first unleashed "The Rite of Spring" in Paris in 1913. The result was a riot where people were outraged and harsh criticism from critics. This of coarse now is one of his most famous and respected compositions.
I love ZTFS as much as Still Life and as much as Question and Answer. ZTFS caused an interesting reaction among Metheny fans. Because it is so dense, the only way to listen to ZTFS is total concentration with a good pair of headsets to capture all the sounds that are going on-so you can hear everything at once and comprehend it (and there is really great guitar work hear). I approach listening in this way now for everything. I also think everyone perceives music differently. So the issue of personal taste must play into this.
|
eric
Nov 20 2012 at 1:07 PM
|
Thought I might add that the reason for
this ’out of the blue’ post about these
recordings is that I came upon some
recent AG posts about them and
Orchestrion. Certainly. Pat’s work doesn’t
need me to defend it. It is Music in the
broadest sense that I want to speak for,
and while American popular culture
doesn’t communicate this much anymore,
this does require effort; to listen, be open
to challenging expressions, accept that
something may not touch your heart but
it may be the greatest thing ever to the
person next to you... All this and more.
I’d like to see people try avoiding what I
call the Beavis response. That is "I don’t
get it. This is uncomfortable. I will make
disparaging remarks about it because
then I feel better about my not getting it."
This need to demean what is not
understood, where did it originate? I see
so called music critics do this as well as
plain folks who are insecure. As a kid, the
more mature listeners here were
fortunate to have radio personalities who
would choose what they liked to play
during their programs. They’d talk about
the music, compare it to things that came
before or were similar in some way. I
remember radio programs that included
music, art reviews, recipes, poetry and
DJs reading the liner notes from the
record sleeves. They’d play entire new
recordings, with no commercial
interruptions and with great mind
opening commentary afterwards. I am a
big fan of much of what the internet
offers us. But I do find in depth
discussion of music mostly missing. So...
best wishes to anyone reading this. And
PS- For a little perspective - I bought
Ornette Coleman’s "Free Jazz" record with
money I earned mowing lawns and
washing cars. I was 10 years old. I liked
Beatles, Beach Boys and jazz my parents
liked, like Louis Armstrong and Stan
Kenton. I bought it because the cover art
was a reproduction of a Jackson Pollack
painting. I thought Jackson Pollack was
the coolest guy ever. Making a living
making paintings like that. Oh man. What
could be better? I read the back cover
liner notes but although I was intrigued
by them I can’t say I was prepared for
what I’d hear when i put the needle in the
groove ! I thought "what have I just spent
my money on?". I kept returning to that
record over many years and today - when
the mood is right - it still rocks my world!
So forget what people tell you to think
about music and listen for yourself. And
turn it up!
|
Login to Post |